GenAI: A Double-Edged Sword for Enterprises

Generative artificial intelligence has recently grown into fame and picked up speed, parading between excitement and trepidation among enterprises. While enormous promises of technology in regard to changing industries take place, the question of whether its very potential pitfalls—lack of governance, skill shortages, and ethical dilemmas—casts a long shadow.

Jay Dalvi, Enterprise Sales Director at Haptik, underlines how governance plays a big part in deploying GenAI successfully: ” Regulation is the biggest challenge with large scale adoption of genAI in enterprises”. “Lack of enough talent and an agile approach to keep pace with the latest and greatest models across the open and closed source models is the challenge. Ethical AI development is most often cited by clients as a big responsibility.”

Dalvi’s view resonates with industry experts and business leaders: If regulated improperly, GenAI can very easily go haywire. The technology generates human-quality text, images, and code; therefore, its possible misapplication in cases of misinformation, deep fakes, copyright infringement, and other abominable uses is already a cause of much concern.

Furthermore, the lack of professionals who are sufficiently competent to make the most of GenAI aggravates the challenges for enterprises. The rapid advancement of technology appears to create a gap in knowledge, making it insurmountably difficult to be consistent with the latest trends and practices by an organization.

Ethical considerations will also come to the fore in GenAI. The more advanced AI systems become, the more the issues of bias, transparency, and accountability rise to the fore. Firms are grappling with the ethics of deploying AI technologies that could, in fact, further inequalities and in other ways hurt people.

Although opening a plethora of challenges, GenAI in itself provides businesses with a range of opportunities that are almost impossible to abstain from. On the other hand, the tech allows the micromanagement of routine tasks, improvement in customer service, and the overall fuel of innovation—factors that could potentially bring great returns on investments. But all this has to be navigated along a complicated landscape of governance, talent, and ethics by enterprises.

With its rich experience in conversational A.I., Haptik is pacing up to build GenAI-driven solutions across enterprises. Addressing customer needs and regional nuance drives the focus of this company and makes it one of the most dominant market players in this space.

“With feedback from customers, Haptik’s genAI suite will continue to evolve keeping regional nuances and data residency requirements. We’ve also seen that WhatsApp as a channel is being underutilized and we’ll evangelize how genAI-powered WhatsApp alone can 10x your returns vs. just WA marketing. We’re also picking up proprietary projects using genAIs multimodal capabilities in image, video, and voice,” says Dalvi.

Another key differentiator for Haptik is the commitment to scalability. What highlights this much better is the ability of the company to process a large quantity of content generation. “Scalability isn’t just a feature; it’s a necessity,” Dalvi stresses. “If your genAI platform can’t handle exponential growth, it has already become obsolete. With a Jio company, we are battle-tested for a scale of 100 million users, which nobody else has had the privilege of, especially at the beginning of their GenAI journey.”

He advises this to businesses wanting to invest in GenAI solutions. “The real criterion is appetite for risk versus reward,” he says. “GenAI is fast evolving, and it’s easy to be left behind if you don’t invest now. There’s no real middle ground when it comes to genAI investments.” The key criteria used in evaluating GenAI solutions include realism, data and prompt engineering ability, accuracy, readiness to test in the real world, and timelines.

Certainly, challenges and opportunities will change with GenAI as it grows. Haptik is one of the leading companies actively invested in removing these types of hurdles so that the full glory of this transformative technology is harnessed. Enterprises will be able to harness the power of GenAI yet mitigate the risks through active collaborative efforts, talent investments, and ethical considerations.

The discourse on GenAI tends to revolve around what technology can do and its strategic consequences for business. But all of this is built both over and along with another very important element in its implementation: the human workforce. Transitioning to a GenAI-driven enterprise would link to a sea change in skills, roles, and structures.

This means that the first and foremost challenge is going to be developing a workforce with the capacity to interface and manage AI systems effectively. It requires specialized technical expertise and business/functional domain knowledge. While the data scientists and engineers would constitute the pivot, roles such as AI trainers, prompt engineers, and AI ethics officers would be all the more important. Such professionals would be engaged in teaching AI systems, optimizing their performance, and ensuring consistency with the organization’s values and societal norms.

Moreover, there is an increased requirement in the workforce for skills in critical thinking, problem-solving, and creativity. Further, routine tasks with a much lesser degree of cognitive demand will be easily automated by AI. Therefore, such ups and downs will require massive programs in upskilling and reskilling to engender the competencies needed by employees to act effectively in a GenAI-enabled environment.

The organizational culture will also go through a sea of change. A culture of experimentation, innovation, and continuous learning becomes mandatory. Employees need to be encouraged to adopt new technologies and experiment with their possible applications. After all, a strong impulse toward collaboration between humans and AI is put forward. Successful implementations of GenAI are really based on a great partnership between humans and machines wherein each complements the strengths of the other.

In that respect, the integration of GenAI into the workplace is not bereft of its own challenges. These include concerns of job displacement and algorithmic bias, along with privacy issues. These risks are huge and have to be evened out through strong strategies being carried out by organizations so as to make this a just and fair transition. For instance, with retraining programs, workers may acquire new skills and change job positions within the same organization. In contrast, transparent and accountable AI systems would lead to low bias levels and confidence in their usage.

On the other hand, the potential of GenAI to create new jobs is not to be matched by any other. As AI does increasingly more of the boring repetitive work, that will release human resources to focus on creative, empathetic, and strategic work that will probably lead to the creation of entirely new industries and job roles.

In other words, successful GenAI workplace integration would require the interaction of technological advances, workforce development, organizational culture, and value considerations. Organizations are thus able to leverage GenAI through investments into human capital and the innovation culture to power their core growth, efficiency, and competitiveness.

The Ethical Imperative

As GenAI becomes pervasive, considerations of its ethical framework become paramount. An AI system should be driven by a strong ethical framework with respect to laying down development and deployment guidelines in favor of human well-being and societal values.

One of the most important ethical considerations in AI systems is bias. If the training data is biased, then an AI model will learn and once again amplify those biases. This can be of serious consequence to the concerned people and communities. Thus, an organization would need to invest in numerous representative datasets, along with very strong detection and mitigation techniques for bias, for this risk to be mitigated.

Another critical concern is privacy. In most cases, GenAI systems rely on large volumes of data. Issues to do with the ownership of data, consent, and security need to be guaranteed. Organizations must implement measures to protect data in order to ensure the privacy of users is also protected and meets its compliance with relevant regulations.

Transparency is an important component of creating trust in AI. Cleared visibility should be there for the user to understand AI functioning and the basis for decision-making. This includes explanations of outputs produced by AI and users’ ability to challenge and contest decisions.

Another obvious ethical consideration is accountability. Organizations need to be responsible for the actions undertaken by their AI systems—clearly outlining propositions for accountability for harm emanating from AI and setting up redress procedures.

Apart from these ethical considerations, the impact of GenAI on the natural environment also has to be carefully assessed. Large language model training is compute-intensive, and the ecological footprint of AI use has to be maintained at a minimum.

Ethical considerations make one build trust in organizations from the side of the customers, employees, and the public. A long-term success of GenAI and a contribution to a better future would require a strong ethical foundation.

The Future of GenAI

This is a fast-growing trajectory of GenAI which has a lot of potential. Having evolved over the years, the technology will transform industries, create new business models, and redefine the nature of work.

Another area where high growth potential lies is Natural Language Processing. Advancements in this will support further advanced and humanlike interactions between humans and machines, likely to be used in creating breakthrough customer service, virtual assistants, and creation of content in general.

Computer vision is the second one. AI with advanced recognition of images is applicable to areas like healthcare, autonomous cars, and surveillance.

This will create a huge opportunity with the confluence of GenAI and other burgeoning technologies, namely in the space of augmented reality, along with virtual reality. For example, AI-driven AR applications will be used in education, training, and entertainment.

However, the full potential of GenAI can be harnessed only if it is joined with responsible development and deployment. Inevitably, challenges to governance, talent, ethics, and societal impact will define a future in which AI works for all of humanity.

By founding this synergy between industry, academia, and governments, we together can work toward that perfect future where GenAI works as a force for good, driving innovation and bettering lives while building a more sustainable and equitable world.

The future of GenAI is at once full of promise and fraught with peril. The technology is chock-full of path-changing potential, with hints of transforming landscapes of industries and business models. The trilemma of governance, talent, and ethics has to be cracked for its growth to be responsible and beneficial. Enterprises that can navigate these complexities are ideally positioned to leverage opportunities surfacing with GenAI.

Sources:

• https://martechvibe.com/article/genai-without-governance-is-a-disaster-waiting-to-happen/
• https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/genai-without-change-management-like-batman-robin-phil-hassey
• https://www.kmworld.com/Articles/Columns/Ethical-innovation/The-trust-problem-with-GenAI-161963.aspx?pageNum=2
•  https://www.pwc.in/assets/pdfs/genai-for-next-gen-governments-january-2024.pdf

Subscribe to our newsletter