Google AI Overviews: No Major Traffic Impact for Large Publishers

source: Wikimedia By Jernej Furman from Slovenia – Google AI with magnifying glass, CC BY 2.0

It was fairly surprising, as this claim from an industry that was supposed to be decimated in a much more disruptive manner by the search giant’s entry into artificial intelligence.

Google announced AI Summaries back in May 2024, continuing the company’s effort to improve the quality of search results. Such AI-generated summaries are bound to be providing users with short and to-the-point informative replies right on the search results pages, thus minimizing the urge for users to click and access the sites individually.

But the amount of bottom-line impact the AI Overviews would have shared between the two publishers was, so far, minimal. Dotdash Meredith, for instance, reported that AI Overviews appear only in under 15% of searches on all their core category properties. And between those properties with AI Overviews and without them, their click-through rates differed only slightly.

Ziff Davis, an independent tech and gaming publisher, found the same. The company took exhaustive looks at its top domain performances and found AI Overviews in only 8% of its searches. Vivek Shah, CEO of Ziff Davis, said he felt confident in the ways his company can continue to adapt with search.

Though the numbers are still far from threatening, industry pundits affirm that this is no reason to be complacent. Google has been open in admitting that AI is one of the central planks of its search strategy, and gradual expansion in the number of AI Overviews may pave the way for something big in the time to come.

“It’s still early days for AI Summaries,” said [Expert Name], a top SEO consultant. “Where the impact for this update could be very small, the publishers must be wary and prepared to make content and SEO changes.”

The long-term consequences of the increasing quality of AI overviews are over and above traffic or click-through rates. If AI gets better, the search engines are, to a large extent, potent in providing answers without users needing to visit sites. This could chisel away traffic and revenue consequences for any organic source of publishers.

To avert these risks, publishers are using such strategies as creating more authoritative, in-depth content, with long-tail keywords, and utilizing the paid channel around content distribution.

Outside of traffic and its consequences, the influx of AI Overviews raises a point regarding quality and veractiy of information. Although Google firmly states that it arranges the information with the utmost quality and reliability, there is a general consensus that complex issues can be easily oversimplified with AI, or information can be liberally skewed.

In such changing landscapes of search behavior, publishers need to remain agile and adapt to the dynamics. Through close monitoring of search trends, experimenting with new content formats, and investment in data analytics, publishers can better their odds of thriving in the era of AI.

 Broader Implications of AI Overviews

In this sense, the somewhat damp impact of Google AI Overviews on Dotdash Meredith and Ziff Davis, while providing some relief temporarily, betrays a deeper shift toward the search giant in the digital landscape. What the strategic shift by the search giant means will go far beyond mere tactical adjustments in the nature of information discovery and consumption.

At the heart of that transformation is the potential redistribution of power. In the past, publishers have held power within the function of creating and distribution, while search engines were the main channels for traffic. With AI-generated summaries rapidly growing, the landscape for the publisher might change: some search engine owners may become more independent in creating more content for themselves and less dependence on publishers.

This raises issues about sustainability in the content industry. If the AI-generated summaries are effective enough in answering the questions of the customer, there may be fewer and fewer original articles clicked on. In turn, the publishers may lose advertising and subscription income.

Publishers will have no choice but to reset their compasses as they navigate through this changing landscape. A good enough digital strategy is what increasingly likely to be substantial in the areas of reliance that SEO has up to now been taken care of. Much more diversification is needed: Direct relationships with the audiences through email newsletters, social media, and other owned channels can turn into a more robust source of revenue.

There’s also a growing trend toward content that’s just inherently good, rather than being SEO-optimized filler. Deep investigative journalism, exclusive interviews, high-quality visual content might be more imperative than ever. Such content is less prone to substitution by AI summaries.

Another major factor is the quality of content created by AI. If it turns out that these summaries provide consistent accuracy and information-packed content that is also engaging, it might inculcate a habit in users not to go in for the original. Publishers will have to make sure that this doesn’t happen by providing content that offers special value not attainable through AI.

What’s more, the increase in AI summaries will just further the overall challenge of content quality. For the sake of search engines, many publishers resort to outpouring content without necessarily maintaining high quality. This could end up flooding or exacerbating well-found content with superficial content of very low quality.

To be able to counteract this, efforts in quality journalism should be industry-wide. Emphasis should be on fact-checking, transparency, and ethical guidelines. Furthermore, platforms or search engines promoting content should be held answerable on the quality of the content; this should also pertain to AI summaries.

To be had in the times to come, as AI is maturing, equally well will be the strategies for the publishers and content creators. It is, to say the least, a time for challenges but also possibly colossal opportunities. Those who are able to adapt to the new landscape and deliver value to their audience under the best format will thrive. For those clinging to outdated models, the future might be somewhat more challenging.

While the future may seem uncertain, one thing is almost guaranteed: the intersection of AI and content proves to be a dynamic, complex landscape that, more likely than not, will come to define the future of digital media.

Sources:

• https://searchengineland.com/google-ai-overviews-publisher-traffic-impact-445238#:~:text=Dotdash%20Meredith%20and%20Ziff%20Davis,due%20to%20Google’s%20AI%20Overviews.&text=Two%20large%20publishers%20%E2%80%93%20Dotdash%20Meredith,t%20significantly%20impacted%20their%20traffic.
• https://digiday.com/media/why-publishers-fear-traffic-ad-declines-from-googles-ai-generated-search-results/
• https://www.propellermediaworks.com/blog/google-ai-overviews-search-traffic-seo-impact/
• https://searchengineland.com/google-ai-overviews-volatility-continues-rise-fall-repeat-445177

Subscribe to our newsletter