Google Faces Antitrust Trial Over Digital Advertising Dominance

Source: Freepik_Free Vector_Search concept for landing page

The Battle Over Digital Advertising

The influential suit pits Google against charges of monopolizing practices in the US$200 billion digital advertising industry. According to a complaint filed by the US Department of Justice, Google abused its dominance in the area of digital advertisements through acquisitions and other anticompetitive conduct, but Google denies this, pointing out that competition exists in the market, and the fees charged are actually lower than an industry average.

The outcome of the case would have a lot of impacts on future online advertising. A win for the DOJ would result in Google business practices being drastically changed and even broken into pieces. A victory for Google would mean it would perfectly solidify as the market leader in digital advertisement.

Allegations from the DOJ

DOJ accused Google of engaging in a wide range of anticompetitive practices. This includes, but is not limited to:

• Buying its competition: Google has bought several of its competitors in the digital advertising space, including DoubleClick, AdMob, and YouTube. According to DOJ, these acquisitions have reduced competition and allowed Google to bolster market power.
• Access to data: Google has been accused of limiting the access to data that would be needed by competitors to compete effectively. For instance, Google limits data from YouTube; this is one of the leading sources of traffic of digitals ads.
• Anti-competitive practices: Google has been accused to indulge in various forms of anti-competitive practices. The complaint has been that Google favors its own offerings and services in the search results and auctions off ad space in a way favoring Google.

Google’s Defence

Google responded that the DOJ’s claims have no merit, and that the digital advertising market is a competitive marketplace, and its fees are below industry average. For instance, Google has also argued that the DOJ has defined its market too narrowly, considering other competing platforms like Facebook and Amazon.

Besides, Google has highlighted the fact that it is the case of the second jurisdiction in which it was sued over antitrust issues. For example, in other jurisdictions such as in the European Union, Google has been found guilty of having engaged in anti-competitive practices. The penalties, however, are relatively very low.

Implications of the Trial

If Google loses this trial, the outcome would have far-reaching implications for the future of online advertising. DOJ wins can change the “state of play” of Google’s business. For example, it might force Google to give up certain acquisitions or change the nature of its auctioning off ad space.

But the DOJ is unlikely to break Google up even if it wins. What would happen is that the DOJ would hit Google with a fine and various penalties.

If Google is acquitted, it simply entrenches its monopoly power in the internet-advertising market. This would have important negative implications for advertisers and publishers who would be left with fewer options other than Google, and therefore had a weaker bargaining position.

What the Trial Portends for Advertisers and Publishers

It can, therefore, determine the fate of advertisers and publishers. If a decision is taken against Google, then increased competition in the digital advertising market would be witnessed. To the benefit of advertisers and publishers, they possess more alternatives to negotiate better terms.

In the alternative, Google would take a victory and fatten its lead as the company with the biggest market share in the digital advert market. This would be harmful to the industry of the advertisers and publishers, who may become more dependent on Google and less able to bargain for good terms.

The verdict of the trial will have the most profound repercussions on digital advertising into the future. If Google is convicted for violating antitrust laws, then it will probably inspire greater competition to become innovative. However, if Google is let off the hook and released, then it may cement its position as a dominant player, thus choking off further competition.

Advertisers and publishers should thus be alert to these possible consequences of the trial and prepared to shift in response to market change.

The Ongoing Battle: Google’s Antitrust Trial

The antitrust case is the landmark trial against Google, choosing whether it should drastically alter the digital advertising market. As the days advance with the accumulation of evidence and expert witnesses, the stakes are mounting for Google as well as the industry as a whole.

DOJ’s Evidence

During the trial, the Department of Justice has built an impressive case against Google, pointing out the dominating power of the business in the digital advertising market. Some of the key pieces of evidence presented in court include:

The DOJ has held that Google exercises control over a huge portion of the ad tech stack, from the tools advertisers use to purchase the ads to those publishers use to sell the ads. As per the claims of the DOJ, this would give Google an opportunity to collect higher fees from advertisers as well as publishers.

Second, the DOJ notes that Google has acquired several other companies in digital advertising space, including DoubleClick, AdMob, and YouTube. The DOJ claims that these acquisitions have led to a reduction in competition that made Google’s chokehold on the market even stronger.

Google’s Anti-Competitive Practices: According to the DOJ, Google has been involved in various anti-competitive practices including giving preferences to its products and services in search results and auctioning ad space so as to favor Google.

Google’s Defense

Google has strongly rebutted all these DOJ accusations. For one, the firm said that it faced stiff competition from other tech giants, including Facebook and Amazon. It said that its fees were more moderate than the industry average. Google also focused on innovation and consumer choice.

Another significant argument Google raises is that dominance it achieved in the online advertising market was because it had superior technology and innovation. The company has argued that its products and services are superior to their competitors’, hence the preference from advertisers and publishers.

Role of Expert Witnesses

No trial would be complete without the necessary expert witnesses. Both the DOJ and Google used experts who testified on various subjects, particularly on the definition of the relevant market, the competitive dynamics of the industry at digital advertising, and the effect which the dominance of Google will most likely have on advertisers and publishers.

Such testimonies of expert witnesses, in particular, have helped the judge to understand better those complex issues involved in this case. For example, experts testify about the technical ones related to ad tech as well as the economic ones concerning Google’s dominance and its potential harm to consumers.

Effect on the Advertisers and Publishers

The impact can be significant on advertisers and publishers alike. A victory for the DOJ might mean increased competition in the market for online advertisements, which should also serve the interests of advertisers and publishers by making it possible for them to have their ultimate choices and negotiate easier terms.

If Google walks away scot-free, it will do all in its power to buttress itself as the uncontested advertising leader in the online marketplace. That would significantly disadvantage advertising and publishers from possibly becoming overly dependent on Google and failing to bargain for better terms and conditions.

The Future of Digital Advertising

Whatever the verdict at the end of the trial will be, change is imminent about to strike the digital advertising world. If there is a guilty verdict for Google on anti-competitive behavior, the face of the market will shift towards more competition and more innovation. When the jury feels that Google is not guilty, this would entrench the latter’s dominant position even further and stifle competition.

Advertising and publishing need to be vigilant enough about the possible trial implications and adapt to and gear themselves for changes in the marketplace in case this marks a change. As the digital development and changes continue to happen, there could be a massive impact on what the landscape will look like shortly.

With the case set to continue, it is going to be up to the DOJ to prove its case against Google. Given the results of this landmark case, this may have wide-ranging implications for the future of the digital advertising industry. The world will soon be seeking to anticipate this.

Sources:

• https://searchengineland.com/google-adtech-antitrust-trial-updates-446488
• https://martech.org/google-adtech-antitrust-trial-everything-you-need-to-know/
• https://www.campaignasia.com/article/breaking-down-the-implications-of-googles-ad-tech-antitrust-trial/498454
• https://www.campaigncanada.ca/article/1889355/breaking-down-implications-googles-ad-tech-antitrust-trial

Subscribe to our newsletter